il computer si ridurra al livello delle console per giocare...playstation(@ davide, si scrive cosi!), xbox,gameboy...
no ho parole....
spero che quelli dell'antitrust non siano gia corrotti...
Let's look at spam first. There has been plenty of research on techniques to automatically reject spam e-mail or restrict the ability of spammers to generate it in the first place. These techniques include the following:
•
Simply rejecting e-mail that isn't authenticated or digitally signed with a "validated" identity (which would block all anonymous e-mail, including desired anonymous e-mail)
•
Forcing spammers to perform some nontrivial computation for each message they wish to send
•
Maintaining per-user lists of approved and nonapproved senders
•
Scoring every inbound e-mail message using heuristics that look for common characteristics of spam messages
Systems built on NGSCB architecture could certainly be used to improve signing-required or computation-required regimes, compared with what is possible today on conventional hardware (the latter is probably more interesting because NGSCB provides facilities that could allow a sender to prove to a recipient that the sender performed a particular computation within the nexus-aware environment.) Clearly, the realm of possibilities for antispam measures on PCs designed to the NGSCB architecture is a topic deserving of further study.
With respect to viruses, the contribution from the NGSCB architecture is more straightforward. Since the nexus and NCAs do not interfere with the operation of any program running in the regular Windows environment, everything, including the native operating system and viruses, runs there as it does today. Therefore, users are still going to need antivirus monitoring and detection software in Windows as well. However, the NGSCB architecture does provide features that can be used by an antivirus program to help guarantee that it has not been corrupted. The antivirus software can be grounded in such a way that it can bootstrap itself into a protected execution state, something it cannot do today
JvloIvk ha scritto:x Crook.Il palladium si può disattivare(come dice il link),ma le funzionalità del tuo computer si riducono enormemente.Ad esempio nn puoi utilizzare le periferiche come il lettore DVD...Il problema cmq è ke molti siti diventeranno visibili solo a computers in cui il palladium è attivato.Addio ad esempio a google ke probabilmente aderirà al progetto.
x Stella.Questo palladium fa solamente gli interessi della Microsoft(e grandi aziende) e delle case discografiche ke finalmente vedranno debellata la pirateria.Nulla di più...Quella della sicurezza è solo una bufala.E' vero ke i virus nn ci saranno più(grazie al cazzo,nn sn programmi autoriazzati),ma i worms gli scripts ke fanno leva sui bugs del sistema, e le truffe via internet nn scompariranno affatto!!
JvloIvk ha scritto:http://www.apogeonline.com/webzine/2002/07/02/01/200207020102
Visitano il forum: Nessuno e 1 ospite