Ecco un esempio.
http://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2017/0 ... 176499111/
SaO ha scritto:nessuno vieta che vengano messe delle barriere ai soldi che vengono spesi nel calcio o ai contratti che i calciatori hanno.
Un matematico ha scritto:... come mia nonna che vuole da anni il sistema per vincere al lotto e crede che io, in quanto matematico, sia fallito perché non glielo trovo
Ah no? Quindi sei anche contro il libero mercato?
Un matematico ha scritto:... come mia nonna che vuole da anni il sistema per vincere al lotto e crede che io, in quanto matematico, sia fallito perché non glielo trovo
SaO ha scritto:nessuno vieta che vengano messe delle barriere ai soldi che vengono spesi nel calcio o ai contratti che i calciatori hanno.
SaO ha scritto:Anche il settore privato è soggetto a regole, il fatto che sia privata significa che gestisce da sé le entrate e le uscite, ma non significa che deve avere lo stesso regime fiscale degli altri.
Tra l'altro al riguardo c'è stata anche la questione del Fair Play finanziario.
Nasmil ha scritto:Questa cosa può essere anche giusta. Dici di fare una cosa in stile NBA dove c'è il salary cap. .
Engler, Mitchell L., The Untaxed King of South Beach: Lebron James and the NBA Salary Cap (June 1, 2011). San Diego Law Review, 2011; Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 340. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1868971 ha scritto:In contrast to major league baseball, the National Basketball Association has a salary cap designed to provide every team an equal and fair chance of competing for the championship. The Miami Heat's recent incredible success in signing the game's three most hotly desired free agents, including mega-stars Lebron James and Dwyane Wade, therefore flies in the face of the NBA's attempted level playing field. How could one team so outmaneuver all the others in the sport which tried to eliminate such uncompetitive results via a salary cap?
As discussed in this Essay, the answer lies in the law of unintended consequences and perverse incentives. Some NBA teams are located in more attractive jurisdictions with nicer amenities or lower costs, such as taxes. In particular, Miami provides a highly-favorable climate both as to weather and taxes as Florida does not have a state income tax. In the absence of any salary cap limitations, teams in higher-tax jurisdictions could compete better with Miami for free agent players by offering higher salaries to offset the extra tax. But the NBA salary cap, by its very terms, blocks this usual free-market response.
Endo, M.G., Florio, K.M., Gerber, J.B. et al. Atlantic Economic Journal (2003) 31: 388. ha scritto:The distribution of playing talent and hence competitive balance in the NBA appears to
be no more equal now under a cap than it was before. Why? Exceptions include allowing
individual teams to exceed the cap if they are re-signing free agents from their own team.
Moreover, in 1974 there were 18 teams in the NBA. League expansions in 1976, 1980, 1988,
1989, and 1995 have brought the number of clubs to 29. Expansion teams tend to struggle
in their early years because of the initial low quality of their playing talent. Although an
XPAN binary variable (equal to I in the expansion years) was not statistically significant
in the GINI regression, increasing the number of teams diminishes.competitive balance by
widening the differences in team strengths. (JEL L83)
jack22 ha scritto:Endo, M.G., Florio, K.M., Gerber, J.B. et al. Atlantic Economic Journal (2003) 31: 388. ha scritto:The distribution of playing talent and hence competitive balance in the NBA appears to
be no more equal now under a cap than it was before. Why? Exceptions include allowing
individual teams to exceed the cap if they are re-signing free agents from their own team.
Moreover, in 1974 there were 18 teams in the NBA. League expansions in 1976, 1980, 1988,
1989, and 1995 have brought the number of clubs to 29. Expansion teams tend to struggle
in their early years because of the initial low quality of their playing talent. Although an
XPAN binary variable (equal to I in the expansion years) was not statistically significant
in the GINI regression, increasing the number of teams diminishes.competitive balance by
widening the differences in team strengths. (JEL L83)
Quindi: il salary cap favorisce i team ricchi a cui è concesso di rifare il contratto ai propri giocatori e aumenta le disparità per i nuovi team che entrano
Conclusione: le disparità sono le stesse prima e dopo il cap (nel campione aumentano ma tale aumento non è significativo)
Visitano il forum: Nessuno e 1 ospite